Ask questions and find answers about TimeXtender Data Integration and TimeXtender Classic desktop applications
Recently active
Hello,I have created a .csv endpoint based on a view in my MDW. I’m able to successfully execute the endpoint manually or through the execution package, where the .csv gets created as expected.However, I can’t seem to add the package to a job, and can’t get it to work through Exmon/Orchestration.In Exmon, my StocklistCSV package can be found. However, when I run it in Exmon, it doesn’t do anything and doesn’t show in the execution log. If I add the package in a process, it won’t run and time-out after 10 minutes.Do you have any idea how I can schedule to execution of the CSV endpoint so it creates the file based on a schedule?
We have a client with a Rest Datasource that does not use URL parameters. Instead they use the post body to pass a series of filters and conditions.We are using this post body to implement Incremental loading from the datasource. It seems to be working correctly in so far as the rest source is definitely loading incrementally.However the Ingest instance does not seem to recognize the tables in the Gen 2 Storage as incremental.We have defined the incremental several times, deleted the entire folder in the Azure Gen2 storage. Still the same result.if we drag the table over to a data area the source in the Ingest instance is not flagged with an “i” indicating that it is incremental.Is this because we are passing the incremental variable through the post body and not as a query parameter?if this is the case is there a work around?The issue we are facing is that we cannot do any downstream incremental loads as TX complains that the source table in the ingets instance is not incremental. Not
When adding a conditional lookup in table A from table B an index is created in table B.This is expected behaviour when the Index generation setting is set to “Automatic”.However, if the lookup operator is set to “None”, no index is created in table B, eventhough index generation is set to automatic.Additionally, if a lookup is at first created with operator “Max” (or any other) an index is created, but if the operator is later changed to “None” the index is automatically removed. This seems like a bug. Is anyone else able to replicate this?I have tested this on version 7026.1
Hi all,I'm currently rebuilding an existing TimeXtender solution in another system and need to rebuild a large number of ETL pipelines.I'm wondering if there's an easy way to export the complete SQL logic for a single table, including things like:Joins Custom fields / calculated fields Transformation logic Lookup logic Any generated SQL behind the tableMy goal isn't to migrate the project itself, but rather to use the generated SQL as a reference.Is there a built-in way to export or generate the full SQL for an individual table, or is there another recommended approach for this type of migration?Have tried looking at the documentation export-option but I don’t think thats what Im looking for.Thanks!
Hello. This document has the ports which need to be opened. Configure your Firewall | Community It doesn't reference Fabric Lakehouse.. are you able to advise what we need to open for the ingest service to communicate to Fabric Lakehouse?Thanks Tim
Hi all,Our TimeXtender is currently growing and growing, which is a good thing. However, I’m experiencing performance issues during TimeXtender execution and would appreciate guidance on both technical optimization and cost-efficient scaling.As my execution packages become unpredictable regarding execution times, i’m running into issues with PowerBI starting it’s refresh without TX being finished.TimeXtender Version: 7158.1 TX O&DQ Version: 26.1.0.23 ODX: Azure Data Lake Gen2 Execution VM: OS: Windows Server 2022 Datacenter Azure Edition Size: Standard D8s v5 (8 vCPUs, 32 GB RAM) Production Instance: SQL Server Storage Azure SQL Database: Tier: General Purpose (Provisioned) Compute: 2 vCores Storage: 65 GB I’m currently integrating data from about 15 sources, distributed across 5 ERP systems.I played around with execution package threads some time ago and i’m using 12 parallel threads for a while now. This package as a total task count of 540. During execution (mainly data load
Hi,We are consolidating our ingestion setup from one ingest instance per environment to a single shared ingest instance for both DEV and PRD environments.Current situation:ODX DEV → DSA_DEV → SSL_DEVODX PRD → DSA_PRD → SSL_PRDTarget situation: ↗ DSA_DEV → SSL_DEVODX PRD ↘ DSA_PRD → SSL_PRDThe DEV VM is able to communicate with the PRD VM, where the shared ODX instance is hosted.Could you please advise on the next steps required to implement this change?
I have read through the guide(s) and posts, but still not able to solve the issue.The pagination info is on the top of the API response I am on page 2, reteriving only 1 record. I can reterieve max 100.This the API endpoint i am using: /api/result?pageNumber=2&pageSize=1{ "pagination": { "total": 29486, "pages": 14743, "page": 2, "pagesize": 1 }, "data": { "cases": [ { "index": 1, "id": 1, "subject": "Hidden", "description": "Hidden", "plaintext": "Hidden", "solution": "Hidden", "status": "Hidden", "priority": null, "impact": "Hidden"} ], "total": 1 }}I have overridden pagination - because not all endpoints are paginated.I dont want to reterieve all pages (which are 30 if i reterieve 1000 records per pageSize) before i know i can reterieve first 5This setting should be 500 recor
I have a large table with about 50 columns. There is column called projectNumber. This column, i am unable to override.This column is varchar. However in TX with Enhanced Drivers it shows Int32.I have overridden it to Text It even says so in Data type overrides on the DataSource I have even tried adding and removing it in Table builder
I believe I have read the documentation, in case I missed something. My bad. Im trying to load csv files from the root of a S3 bucket. The 'test connection’ in the portal turns green but when trying to synchronize in timextender it tells me I have to enter a value for ‘path’.I have tried these so far: /.mybucketname/inbound/s3://mybucketname/inbound/But timextender keeps throwing errors saying the directory does not exist. I can succesfully connect to it and download the csv's via Python so Im quite sure the setup is correct. Does anyone know what to fill in for ‘path’?
As you can see in this screenshot I’ve a custom field, defined several months ago, that uses fields from two tables: The model works perfectly, but in the current version I cannot edit and more CRITICAL for me, I cannot create a similar new one.I don’t know when this problem appears, but I’ve detect it today.What’s happen?
I have followed this guide to set-up an Incremental load on a table in BU:Incremental Loading in a Business Unit (BU) in TimeXtender Classic | CommunityHowever, during the deploy i get an error:Data source Incr LoadsValidation status: ValidMessage: OKStaging Database ODXValidation status: ValidMessage: OKTable: Incr_LoadValidation status: ValidMessage: OKIncremental LoadValidation status: ErrorMessage: Incremental load is not supported on this table.Details:Data source Incr Loads ...TimeXtender.DataManager.UserErrorExceptionIt says in the guide that: When the option is enabled and the table is deployed, TimeXtender performs the following:Initial Full Load: The system fully loads the table. Setting content of the _I Table: This table records the largest incremental field value from the given load I am attachig a video of where i get an error.What am i doing wrong?
Can I preserve my source field names when synchronizeing my fields?I dont want spaces and periods replaces by an underscore, my current workaround is to edit the fields manually when I use the tables in my prepare instance.
Version: TX 7158.1Hello,I’m currently running into an incremental loading issue where the source system automatically generates invoices in batches. This inserts new rows/Primary keys in the invoice table. It could be that certain invoices are scheduled for a batch. Let’s say from 24-07-2026 scheduled for 29-07-2026.If that’s the case, the new row will get inserted on 29-07-2026 with a datelastmodified of 24-07-2026. Any changes to that document will trigger the datelastmodified correctly, only this process gives this issue. In that case, my incremental loading will completely miss these new document / primary keys (currently -1 day offset).Is there a way to always add new primary keys but only do the updates based on the datelastmodified timestamp?
Hello,Couldn’t quickly find a similar thread so I would like to ask it here.What is the best way to transfer selected objects between environments, TEST→ PROD or is it still all or nothing? We’ve integrated a new ERP system and I only want to migrate tables from this new source to PROD, not all the other changes I’ve been working on.Would be great to just select which objects I want to push to the next envrionment.
In TX Enhanced Connector, how do one handle fields in JSON response that has the same name?In the screen-grab below, the fields in marked in red comes multiple times but the values are different.In TX Enhanced Connector, the field always grabs the value of the first occurance of the field i have marked in red.Is there a way to grab the desired value by doing somethng like this:/json/addendumValues/addendumGroups/rows[0]/json/addendumValues/addendumGroups/rows[1]/json/addendumValues/addendumGroups/rows[2]/json/addendumValues/addendumGroups/rows[3] If not, is there a way to grab everything in blue and show in one column?I can then creat a view in BU and grab each saperately The screen grabs are broek here: Understanding and using script parameters in TimeXtender Classic | Community, so i can not fuly understand the documentation
Hi,In one of my CData connections i have a RSD file for an endpoint with the follwing code for startPeriod and endPeriod <api:set attr="out.TodayDate" value="[dummy | CURRENT_DATE()]"/><api:set attr="out.StartPeriodYear" value="[out.TodayDate | year()]"/><api:set attr="out.StartPeriod" value="[out.StartPeriodYear | insert(4,01)]"/><api:set attr="out.EndPeriod" value="[out.StartPeriodYear | insert(4,12)]"/> This i refer to in POST statement in { "fromValue": "{startPeriod}", "restrictionType": ">=", "columnName": "period", "relDateCrit": "" }, { "fromValue": "{endPeriod}", "restrictionType": "<=", "columnName": "period", "relDateCrit": "" }Is this the correct way - instead of hard coding? Name Value todayDate CURRENT_DATE() startPeriodYear year(todayDate) startPeriod insert(startPeriodYear, 4, '01') endPeriod insert(startPeriodYear, 4, '12') And then, in the
Hello,After Snowflake enabled behavior change bundle 2026_04 on our production account, our execution packages began failing. TimeXtender generates the "SCD Surrogate Hash Key" column as a virtual (computed) column with a NOT NULL constraint.As of bundle 2026_04, Snowflake rejects NOT NULL/CHECK constraints on virtual columns at DDL time, so the CREATE TABLE statement for the TX-generated temporary staging table now fails. The same project ran fine until the bundle was enabled, and runs fine again after we temporarily disabled the bundle.The failures occur only on tables that have History (SCD) settings enabled. Tables without history are unaffected, which is consistent with the surrogate hash key being generated specifically for the history/SCD code path.Environment- TimeXtender Data Integration, product/portal version: 7158.1- Data storage: SnowflakeError messageJavaScript execution error: Uncaught Execution of multiple statements failed on statement "CREATE TABLE ...#<temp>...
I have en endpint with multiple parameters:CaseHandling/External/Cases/GetCases?exportFields=CaseID&exportFields=Closed&exportFields=Position&exportFields=ProjectLevel&exportFields=Anonymous&Key is always exportFields Values are differentIn CData i have no issues getting values in the columns.In TX Enhanced Connection, when i define multiple parametes with key-anme exportFields and different value, only the last is shown: This is how i have defined in TX Endpoint I have tried the whole endoint in Path, which gived empty table
Installed data integration and ingest services 7361.1 I cannot start the Timextender execution services also not after I download the config file and replaced it
Dear sir,How can I remap tables to a different ODX instance automatically, instead remapping tables manually for a 100+ tables (V7303.1).Any suggestion is welcome.Thanx.Regards,Arthur
Hi, TimeXtender Data Integration 7303.1I got this error when opening instance An error occurred while fetching data from the database.Failed to enable constraints. One or more rows contain values violating non-null, unique, or foreign-key constraints.Location: Table: TableInsertSelectionRuleFieldsForeignKeyConstraint TableInsertSelectionRules_TableInsertSelectionRuleFields requires the child key values (881d81f2-2ee7-4716-8eb8-d9da2332b33d) to exist in the parent table.. How to solve this? best regards,Bjørn A.
The use of PBI semantic models require to use XMLA endpoint, that’s mean that we need a Power Bi PPU license. That it’s ok.The question it’s why not use the deployment pipelines feature in PBI PPU?The principal problem that I found it’s that it’s not possible to parametrize the data source conections to use correctly this feature.Somebody has experience in this topic?
Hi,TimeXtender Data Integration 7303.1TimeXtender Ingest Service 7313.1 We are connected to our Azure Datalake Gen2 storagecontainer (tested OK through TDI) We are having problems with our ingestserver trying to connect to all our data sources. All of them are timing out when running and they fails with no log The only log we kan find are from TimeXtender O&DQ Desktop (see att.)We have been trough https://support.timextender.com/initial-setup-start-here-115/configure-your-firewall-700 and done the tests, all OKTest-NetConnection sql-instances-prod.database.windows.net -port 20000Test-NetConnection sql-instances-prod-002.database.windows.net -port 20000Test-NetConnection traws.timextender.com -Port 443Test-NetConnection gateway.timextender.com -Port 443Test-NetConnection gateway.timextender.com -Port 80Test-NetConnection sbns-customer-prod-001.servicebus.windows.net -port 5671Test-NetConnection sbns-customer-prod-001.servicebus.windows.net -port 5672Test-NetConnection auth0.com -P
Incremental Load Strategy for Data Warehouse Layer (Prepare Views → DW Hi everyone,We’re working on a project for a TPA that provides property and casualty services to smaller P&C companies. The architecture connects to multiple disparate sources that ultimately feed into a standardized data warehouse.Here’s our current setup:Architecture:We’re creating a raw schema in Prepare for each data source, then using views to abstract the transformation logic. The DW maps from those views. So the flow is: Source → Ingest → Prepare (raw) → Prepare (views) → DW.What’s working:Incremental loads are running well from Source to Ingest and from Ingest to Prepare raw — no issues there.The challenge:The DW layer currently runs as a full load every time. We’re moving roughly 200M rows per company. Load times are about 1:45 hours, which is manageable, but we’d like to bring that down with incremental loads. It would also reduce the vCore demand — we’re currently on 8 vCores Premium Series with memor
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.