Skip to main content
To homepage To homepage

    Filter by idea status

    Filter by product

    859 Ideas

    M
    Visitor
    matthew.montanaVisitor

    Multiple Text File import optionsSUBMITTED

    Please add the following new features... 1. When selecting multiple text file as a data source, please add the option to import only the latest file into the warehouse rather than all files, based on the timestamp of the individual files. For example, if I have Aging20180401.csv and Aging20180402.csv in the same directory, I would like to be able to import only the "02" version as it is the newest one in the directory. 2. Please allow for multiple files to be in a directory, and have the option to load those files into the warehouse in chronological order. For example, if I have Aging20180401.csv and Aging20180402.csv in the same directory, I would like to be able to import both files but make sure they come into the warehouse in a selectable order (oldest first, newest first, alphabetically, etc.). Thanks.

    2
    thagin
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    S
    Visitor
    stuart.bramallVisitor

    Update Schema Security after a table deploymentSUBMITTED

    Hi It would be great if security was redeployed after a table is deployed. At the moment we may secure a table but when we deploy the table the security is dropped when the table is recreated and we have to then remember to redeploy security other wise user are not able to view the data   thanks      

    1
    S
    Visitor
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    andri
    Contributor
    andriContributor

    Convert a Business unit to a Data WarehouseSUBMITTED

    Being able to convert a business unit to a data warehouse within Timextender would save a lot of time if a customer want's to adapt to a newer project structure with an ODX database. Currently it requires re-doing all transformations, lookups and logic for the entire staging database.

    5
    W
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    L
    Visitor
    l.vecchioneVisitor

    Customization of System FieldsSUBMITTED

    Hi,  in order to provide a better service with a better data quality could be necessary for our project to modify the name and behaviour of system field.  The basic functionality are very useful but since they are field which are currently visualizable on all the created tables could be very interesting if the possibility of customization, with the necessary caution, could be available.  Here a list of features which could be great to have available:  1) The renaming as i.e from DW_SourceCode to XXXX_XXX or whatever; 2) The possibility of changing the current showed value such as for the mentioned field : i.e in DW_SourceCode change the "Aggregate" value to "Anything"; 3) The possibility of Using the field somehow, for example with relationship or transformations.  I hope that everybody reading this post will keep adding some features by post.  The System Field could be a great resource, but they really need to be customizable.    Thank you very much for your effort, Kind Regards,  Luigi Vecchione

    2
    L
    Visitor
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    S
    Participant
    steven.koppenolParticipant

    Easily reference "current field" in SQL snippets and custom transformationsSUBMITTED

    In many transformations you need a reference to the "current field". Example a tranform in [Field A] could be: coalesce(nullif( [Field A], N''), N'Unknown') In this case, it would be a huge improvement of we could something like the following instead of having to assign a parameter. Especially when working with SQL snippets it would greatly improve usability as it allows drop-in snippets that don't need parameterization. coalesce(nullif( [CURRENT_FIELD], N''), N'Unknown') It should be noted that in the case of a self-reference, having an actual parameter has little benefit anyway as a self reference has no lineage impact  

    7
    AvanWijnen
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    R
    Participant
    r.miltenburgParticipant

    Add Data Export to set as global database (environment properties)SUBMITTED

    It would be nice to set the data export as a global database since we are using test data and production data. Every time we transfer from test environment to production environment we have to change the paths of the data exports manually to our production file server name.

    1
    AvanWijnen
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago

    Run multiple executions parallel in one projectIMPLEMENTED

    In this case we have a package that runs once a day and takes 1 hour to reload. Besides this there is a package which run every 5 minutes the whole day long. Now it gives an error when running the once a day reload and try to start the every 5 minute reload. After the reload is done the every 5 minute reload will run again successfully.At the moment there is a solution to create "ghosts" projects. But in my opinion this is not desirable.

    1
    AvanWijnen
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    M
    Explorer
    mark.beedleExplorer

    Differential Deployment - SSAS TabularSUBMITTED

    It would be ideal if we could use differential deployment in the semantic layer, particularly in SSAS Tabular, or at least choose which table I want to deploy, as opposed to deploying the whole model.   If I make a change to the DAX of a single measure of a 5 gb tabular model, it is less than ideal to then deploy the entire database and process full, just to see the effect of the DAX measure in a front end tool.   Developing SSAS tabular seems to be quicker and easier in VS because of this feature.

    1
    andri
    Contributor
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    peter.jensen
    TimeXtender Xpert
    peter.jensenTimeXtender Xpert

    Environment properties for ODX Server used in projectsSUBMITTED

    Hi, Some of our customers want to setup 2 ODX Servers (1 for dev and 1 for test and production).  On the Dev ODX Server we would like to connect to development-db-sources.  So, it would be very handy if we could automatically swap between the 2 ODX Servers using the multi-environment setup of Discovery Hub when pushing a project from dev to test / prod. Best regards, Peter

    3
    L
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    R
    Participant
    raf.lemmensParticipant

    Logging on data cleansing procedureSUBMITTED

      Already asked by Peter Jensen with 9 upvotes in 2017. No comments from any TX Employees so far.So even today I am forced to modify the cleansing procedure and add my own logging...It would nice to be able to have an option per table by which you can enable extended data cleansing logging.This would log the start and end date of each step in this procedure to a dedicated log table. (Have to do this when a proc starts throwing timeouts or takes a long time all of sudden)I think this takes about 15 minutes to implement into your code base.At the start of the proc you check if the logging table exists else you create one.Before each step in the proc you store the datetime in a variable.At the end of each step you write a record to the log table and reset the start time again as such: IF OBJECT_ID(N'etl.HAWEmployeesPlanningMT_DataCleansingLog', N'U') IS NULL AND @enableExtendedLogging = 1BEGINCREATE TABLE etl.HAWEmployeesPlanningMT_DataCleansingLog (Id BIGINT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,Version BIGINT NOT NULL,Step NVARCHAR(1000) NOT NULL,DateTimeStart DateTime,DateTimeStop DateTime,CONSTRAINT [PK_bb573581_2114_4b3e_b1bd_042488deac10] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (Id ASC) ) ENDSET @DateTimeStart = GETDATE()SET @step = 'Keep field values up-to-date: detect lookup value changes'-- Keep field values up-to-date: detect lookup value changes/* TX generated SQL */IF @enableExtendedLogging = 1INSERT INTO etl.HAWEmployeesPlanningMT_DataCleansingLog(version, Step, DateTimeStart, DateTimeStop) VALUES(@version, @step, @DateTimeStart , GETDATE())SET @DateTimeStart = GETDATE()SET @step = 'Update conditional lookup fields (Many lookups, Take the first value):''CustomerHQId'',''CustomerCode1'',''IsTardyCancellation'',''IsExaminationsFinished'',''DateExamination'',''ExaminationPart1ResearchCode'',''MedicalExaminationCode'',''ExaminationTypeCode'',''MedicalExamination_IsPeriodical'',''CategoryCode'',''SubmissionCategory'',''DateInFunction'',''DateOutService'',''PlanningTimeCell_Time'',''PlanningEntityDate'''-- Update conditional lookup fields (Many lookups, Take the first value):/* TX generated SQL */IF @enableExtendedLogging = 1INSERT INTO etl.HAWEmployeesPlanningMT_DataCleansingLog(version, Step, DateTimeStart, DateTimeStop) VALUES(@version, @step, @DateTimeStart , GETDATE()) https://support.timextender.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/115011859306-Logging-during-Cleansing-Stored-Procedure   

    2
    R
    Participant
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    andri
    Contributor
    andriContributor

    Support for Many-to-Many relationships in SSAS TabularSUBMITTED

    Since SQL Server 2019 it is now possible to create a Many-to-Many relationship in SSAS Tabular. That cardinality option is currently not available in Discovery Hub.

    4
    T
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    D
    Contributor
    dsvartzmanContributor

    ODX server: add ODX tasks to project executionSUBMITTED

    Hi,    At the moment the ODX server is quite stand-alone. There is no way to execute ODX task as part of package execution. project execution will carry on regardless if the odx task has successfully executed or not.   One possible solution would be to add all ODX task as 'External Executables' In this way you can add the ODX task to the project's execution module  

    1
    G
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    andri
    Contributor
    andriContributor

    Ignore failure on included steps in the execution packageSUBMITTED

    When setting up execution packages it could be very useful to ignore/allow individual steps (objects, other execution packages, perspectives) to fail without failing the execution. The step would fail and continue with the next one.

    4
    H
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    D
    Participant
    david.zebrowitzParticipant

    ODX to DW Individual Field additions to existing tableIMPLEMENTED

    When dragging a table from the ODX to a DW using the secondary mouse button, we are able to use a field selection dialogue to choose the specific fields we would like to add to the new DW table. However, if I have an existing table, there is not an easy way to add just one or two fields as needed.  Instead I have to synchronize the ODX table to the DW table, which will add all the remaining fields.  Then, I need to delete the extra fields which are not needed.  In some cases, this could be 150+ fields! Ideally, I'd LOVE to see the traditional Data Selection pane being used here.  That is an outstanding feature which is sorely missed in ODX projects.  Especially the ability to preview the data and select fields right from that preview.  I understand that doesn't really fit with how the ODX functions, but the ability to select individual fields to add to an existing table is a must have.

    3
    Thomas Lind
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    D
    Participant
    david.zebrowitzParticipant

    %Environment% Parameter for NotificationsSUBMITTED

    Currently, we have 3 parameters which can be used in the Notification email Subject:   Execution packages which are scheduled normally have the environment name in them, but sometimes we need to manually run a more generic execution package in an environment... for instance, to force a full load.    In that scenario, it would be helpful to be able to use the %ENVIRONMENT% project variable in the notification. Our only alternative is to setup multiple copies of execution packages right now.

    0
    D
    Participant
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    W
    Visitor
    wahyudi.vermeulenVisitor

    Multi language in SSAS tabularSUBMITTED

    In SSAS tabular there is an option to import a JSON file for multi-language support. So we have a possibility to support our customers with a dutch or English Cube. You can read more about this option: https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/4547/multilanguage-support-for-ssas-tabular-models/ Is there such solution in TimeXtender where we can set a second language?

    2
    D
    Participant
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    bas.hopstaken
    TimeXtender Xpert
    bas.hopstakenTimeXtender Xpert

    Setup a Certification program for TimeXtenderIMPLEMENTED

    Not really a feature for Discovery Hub, but it would be nice that we can do an official TimeXtender exam and earn a certificate. 

    2
    bas.hopstaken
    TimeXtender Xpert
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    L
    Starter
    lennaert.vd.brinkStarter

    Qlik endpoint for clustered environmentsSUBMITTED

    Recently I found out that the TimeXtender implementation of the Qlik endpoint bypasses the Qlik Load balancing. In the ideal situation the following workflow would happen: In TX end-point we add the hostname of the Qlik Central node When the TX endpoint is exectuted, TX calls the central node Central node distributes the task to one of the available nodes for execution Currently however, the hostname that is called will always be the node that executes. This is even the case when the central node is set to Master only and therefore should not be performing any reload tasks whatsoever. I suspect this happens because TimeXtender calls the app:Reload endpoint in Qlik. Perhaps it would be possible to have the TX deploy create a task in Qlik that is then called on execute using the task:Start API endpoint. In any case, TimeXtender should work with Qlik in such a way that it allows the load balancing of Qlik to do it's job in order to facilitate bigger enterprise size architectures.

    0
    L
    Starter
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    W
    Contributor
    wynkoopContributor

    Add Data Selection Rule and Column Selection to Securable ViewsSUBMITTED

    The securable views are pretty useful, but suffer from a couple of important limitations.   The first is that each view will contain every record from its source table.  This isn't always desirable - it may be ideal to create a view of a fact that contains only certain kinds of transactions, or a view of a Type II SCD dimension with only the current values.  Right now, the only way to accomplish this is to create physical versions of these tables, which is a clunky solution at best and unviable at worst.  The other problem is that you can't control what columns end up in these views.  The most obvious problem issue is that this means that all of the system fields will show up in the securable view, which is not desirable because these views are almost always exposed directly to the user.  It also reveals the existence of all the columns in the table to everyone who has access to the view, even if access to those columns is restricted by a security policy.   If these two features were added, securable views would be considerably more flexible and powerful tools!

    1
    J
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago

    Publish to multiple Qlik Sense streams from one SLSUBMITTED

    At the moment is it possible to create two endpoints in one semantic layer so it will create two apps in Qlik Sense. Sadly, the name of the app could not be the same. I would like to publish app one to stream one and app two to stream two and the apps should have the same name.

    4
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    W
    Contributor
    wynkoopContributor

    Change Junk Dimension Key Data TypeSUBMITTED

    Currently, junk dimension tables are automatically keyed with varbinary 64 fields.  This takes up a lot of room in a fact table and can’t be used as a join in Tabular.  Can junk dimensions share the functionality of the supernatural key stores by storing the hash locally, and using an integer as a key instead?

    8
    rory.smith
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    R
    Participant
    raf.lemmensParticipant

    Community - Product Feedback and Ideas - response rateIMPLEMENTED

    I know this post is a little bit different of the conventional post on this forum.But I am noticing a lot of posts with massive up-votes or a myriad of posts on the same topic indicating an urgent request from the community.However it seems these posts are not getting any attention from TimeXtender for quite some time now..., yet posts with 0 or 1 vote are being answered... Is it because you guys are planning on a massive engine overhaul or something else. Feedback on these topics would be appreciated. 

    2
    R
    Participant
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    bas.hopstaken
    TimeXtender Xpert
    bas.hopstakenTimeXtender Xpert

    Clone Semantic ModelSUBMITTED

    Add an option to clone a Semantic Model. (just like the Qlik Models in the Qlik tab)

    2
    D
    Contributor
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    G
    Explorer
    gerard.cuijpersExplorer

    Sorting in dropdownlistSUBMITTED

    As many requests are allready in place to sort various lists (which are not affected by sorting the perspective) When adding a table insert, the list is unsorted, it's also not the order they are created it's just random and when the list is long, you have to visually scroll to find the object you need. When selecting a column in the table insert, the list is not sorted. And allthough you can type the first letter, but that only works for the first items with that letter, when they are down the list again with the same letter they are not found. There are more, Ill try to add them later on'.

    2
    K
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago
    R
    Participant
    raf.lemmensParticipant

    Tabular display folder - set on Dim or Fact levelSUBMITTED

      Provide an option to set display folders on Dimension or Fact level.Each time someone adds an hierarchy, measure, attribute we have to tick the correct display folders.   In most cases a display folder is used for an entire fact or dimension and not for one attribute.

    1
    E
    Forum|Forum|5 years ago

    Filter by product

    • All products
    • TimeXtender Data Integration
    • TimeXtender Data Integration Portal
    • TimeXtender Data Enrichment
    • TimeXtender Orchestration & Data Quality
    • TimeXtender Classic
    • Data source providers
    • Exmon
    Terms and ConditionsAccessibility statement